Report on Healthcare Abortion
By: Sara Gomer and Ellie Miller
Abortion has always been a women’s rights
issue. Women have been fighting for power ever since they have gained the right
to vote. It has always been about what women are allowed to act in society.
Currently, congress is dealing with a new healthcare reform bill to allow all
Americans basic healthcare coverage so no one is uninsured in the United
States. However, in the bill, the topic of abortion was amended to not be
covered by this new bill because it was said that “moderate democrats” would
approve the bill if healthcare wasn’t covered. Our stream is about Abortion in
relation to the new healthcare bill.
@ |
http:// |
RT |
# |
596 |
2316 |
2848 |
673 |
Some phrases that we used when trying to find
out which search phrases to use for our project are: abortion, healthcare and
abortion, abortion covered by healthcare, and healthcare abortion. The phrase
that had enough tweets to research yet not be overwhelming was the pairing of
healthcare abortion with no and. We started with 1287 tweets on the 18th
of November and finished with 1329 on December 2nd. Throughout the
many tweets, there were both positive and negative views expressed towards the
idea of the new healthcare bill covering abortion. Some were more in favor of
the healthcare bill with an abortion clause and others were more in favor of
the bill without an abortion clause. A majority of the tweets all had a common
goal of having a healthcare bill. The statistics for our external references
are as follows:
And the top 6 users-in order- with the most
messages total on our topic are: Voteglobal, VoteGlobalPolls, USHealthcareIT,
Health_2, Healthnewsblogs, and Healthcareintl. These six users are who we will
look at in depth when looking at our search topic.
The person with the most tweets about
healthcare and abortion was Voteglobal with 3.99 percent of our tweets. Voteglobal
started tweeting in June 2009. Their tweets are mainly about voting, elections,
and polls. The tweets also about bans, protests, and support. Voteglobal is
following 2,001 people and has 1,350 followers. Their followers have been
increasing since June 2009 and they also have a few networking connections.
They’re connected to VoteGlobalPolls, FTA_Facillitators, Filterdnews, manic77,
Iranvideos, and Headlinesindia. Their connections seem politically interested as
well. In the tweets we gathered in our search, Voteglobal mostly posed the
question, “ Should abortion be covered by healthcare insurance?” and sent
readers to a link. They also directed people in their tweets towards a few
polls to see what people thought. With multitude of information being sent out,
they ran into some technical issues and answered ProChoiceGal’s question in a
tweet. Overall, they were very news based on the topic.
Our second most frequent tweeter was
USHealthcareITI with 3.7 percent of our tweets. In the tweets we collected for
healthcare and abortion they also sent links to people. The links were mostly
to articles about the abortion controversy. They seem against the abortion
amendment in the articles they are asking people to read. For example one of
the tweets says “Pelosi, Obama violate first amendment on abortion amendment.”
Then it has a link to an article that people either in agreement, or in strong
disagreement, can read. They started
tweeting in August of 2009. Since they stared tweeting they have sent 3,097
tweets. They are not just about healthcare, although quite a few are. They talk
about democrats, congress, Obama, insurance and other things that are big
political issues. They have 251 followers. They are not following anyone. Their
follwers are increasing since august 2009. The only network connection
USHealthcareIT seems to have is to #39.
Third of our top six twitter users was
VoteGlobalPolls with 3.13 percent of our tweets. The majority of there tweets
are similar to the tweets by voteglobal. They pose the queston should abortion
be covered by healthcare insurance, and then send a link for people to give
their vote on the subject. VoteGlobalPolls has been tweeting since October
2009. During this time they have sent out 1388 status updates. VoteGlobalPolls
is passionate about politics and voting so their topics were mainly about
votes, results, polls, etc. they also talked about the things beign voted on
also, like, environment, refugees, and insurance. They follow 1,173 people and
have 427 followers. Since October 2009, when VoteGlobalPolls started tweeting,
their follwers have been steadily increasing. They have a few network
connections. They are politically active connections, like WeedFeed,
VoteGlobal, and gotpolitics?.
The
fourth of our top six twitter users was
Health_2 with 3.13 percent of our tweets. They started tweeting in October
2009. They have a total of 2,366 tweets mostly about health issues, such as
running, weight loss, diet, exercise, but it also extends to subjects like
recession, reform, and Obama. They are currently following 922 people and have
529 followers. Their followers are steadily growing, however, and have been
consistently since they started tweeting in October. When looking at their connections you can see
they are tied to a lot of health based and concerned twitter accounts like
Wholefoods, FitnessMagazine, and goodhealth. Regarding our search topic, their
tweets were anti-abortion covered by healthcare. They portrayed activist
feelings of the Republican Party. In their tweets they include some links, but
not many. We noticed when reading their tweets that there seemed to be repeats
of other people’s tweets, such as, “abortion, wellness, and other healthcare
questions Los Angeles times” which was tweeted by Headlinehoncho as well. They
also said, “Pelosi, Obama violate first amendment on abortion amendment.” As we
showed previously in our paper USHealthcareIT tweeted the same thing. Overall,
they presented an interesting view on abortion, even with retweets.
The fifth of our top six tweeters with 2.56
percent of our gathered tweets was healthnewsblogs. The majority of their tweets
in our sample were about political groups in power like the house and senate.
They seem to be neutral on the topic of abortion covered by healthcare. the
cover both sides of the issues. They give links to both points of views.
healthnewsblogs has been tweeting since Januray 2009. In that time they have
sent 8396 status updates. Those updates have been about health related topics
such as, blood, vaccines, aids, and h1n1. Healthnewsblogs follows six people
and has 1527 followers. Since January 2009, when healthnewsblogs started
tweeting, their followers have been increasing steadily. They have four network
connections. They are health. Healthcare, #127, and#x2122.
The last of our top six tweeters was healthcareintl. They contributed to 2.24 percent of our total tweets with 11 tweets. Their tweets all have links to articles from them. They are talking about the complications of the abortion amendment. They seem to be fair though, as they talk about both points of views complications. They are asking people reading their tweets to go to the articles to read about the problems of the abortion amendment in the healthcare plan. Healthcareintl has been tweeting since January 2009. During the time they have been tweeting they have sent out 7,900 status updates. Their topics cover mostly health issues, as you would expect from their username, like weight, drug, health, and abortion. They have some other recent topics in their cloud though, that don’t seem to be about health, like comic and advent. Healthcareintl is following 6 people, but they have 1,031 followers at the moment. Their followers escalated very quickly when they first started using twitter, slowed down a bit from July to August, but have been growing since august fairly linearly.
All of our top six tweeters had interesting view points to present about abortion being covered by healthcare. They all presented their views clearly through their tweets, even when that view was completely neutral. One thing they all did to get people interested in their tweets was put links to articles expressing their personal opinions, and others, about abortion being covered by healthcare. We also noticed a trend of repeat tweets on groups that had shared view points about abortion being covered by healthcare. For example USHealthcareIT and Health_2 had one of the same tweets, but it was because they wanted tweeters to view the same article because they share similar points of views on the article. It was about Obama and Pelosi.
Some of the differences we noticed
were how they introduced the articles they were trying to get tweeters to go to
and read. Some told who the authors of the article were, like Health_2 when
they tweeted, “ The Politics of loosening Helathcare abortion restirictions US
news.” They were telling their readers where the article they were linking to
was coming from to establish credablitty in their links. Others didn’t put
where it came from and just used striking, or provocative phrases, or
capitalization to get the reader interested in going to the link they had posted
like, “COMPROMISE
NEEDED WITH ABORTION FOES IN HEALTHCARE REFORM: The President also complained
that abortion legislat..”The capitalization gets the reader’s attention so they
read the quote and go to the link.